Can bryophyte groups increase functional resolution in tundra ecosystems?
Research output: Contribution to journal › Review › Research › peer-review
Standard
Can bryophyte groups increase functional resolution in tundra ecosystems? / Lett, Signe; Jónsdóttir, Ingibjörg S.; Becker-Scarpitta, Antoine; Christiansen, Casper T.; During, Heinjo; Ekelund, Flemming; Henry, Gregory H. R.; Lang, Simone I.; Michelsen, Anders; Rousk, Kathrin; Alatalo, Juha M.; Betway, Katlyn R.; Rui, Sara B.; Callaghan, Terry; Carbognani, Michele; Cooper, Elisabeth J.; Cornelissen, J. Hans C.; Dorrepaal, Ellen; Egelkraut, Dagmar; Elumeeva, Tatiana G.; Haugum, Siri V.; Hollister, Robert D.; Jägerbrand, Annika K.; Keuper, Frida; Klanderud, Kari; Lévesque, Esther; Liu, Xin; May, Jeremy; Michel, Pascale; Mörsdorf, Martin; Petraglia, Alessandro; Rixen, Christian; Robroek, Bjorn J. M.; Rzepczynska, Agnieszka M.; Soudzilovskaia, Nadejda A.; Tolvanen, Anne; Vandvik, Vigdis; Volkov, Igor; Volkova, Irina; Zuijlen, Kristel van.
In: Arctic Science, Vol. 8, No. 3, 2022.Research output: Contribution to journal › Review › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Can bryophyte groups increase functional resolution in tundra ecosystems?
AU - Lett, Signe
AU - Jónsdóttir, Ingibjörg S.
AU - Becker-Scarpitta, Antoine
AU - Christiansen, Casper T.
AU - During, Heinjo
AU - Ekelund, Flemming
AU - Henry, Gregory H. R.
AU - Lang, Simone I.
AU - Michelsen, Anders
AU - Rousk, Kathrin
AU - Alatalo, Juha M.
AU - Betway, Katlyn R.
AU - Rui, Sara B.
AU - Callaghan, Terry
AU - Carbognani, Michele
AU - Cooper, Elisabeth J.
AU - Cornelissen, J. Hans C.
AU - Dorrepaal, Ellen
AU - Egelkraut, Dagmar
AU - Elumeeva, Tatiana G.
AU - Haugum, Siri V.
AU - Hollister, Robert D.
AU - Jägerbrand, Annika K.
AU - Keuper, Frida
AU - Klanderud, Kari
AU - Lévesque, Esther
AU - Liu, Xin
AU - May, Jeremy
AU - Michel, Pascale
AU - Mörsdorf, Martin
AU - Petraglia, Alessandro
AU - Rixen, Christian
AU - Robroek, Bjorn J. M.
AU - Rzepczynska, Agnieszka M.
AU - Soudzilovskaia, Nadejda A.
AU - Tolvanen, Anne
AU - Vandvik, Vigdis
AU - Volkov, Igor
AU - Volkova, Irina
AU - Zuijlen, Kristel van
N1 - CENPERMOA[2022]
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - The relative contribution of bryophytes to plant diversity, primary productivity, and ecosystem functioning increases towards colder climates. Bryophytes respond to environmental changes at the species level, but because bryophyte species are relatively difficult to identify, they are often lumped into one functional group. Consequently, bryophyte function remains poorly resolved. Here, we explore how higher resolution of bryophyte functional diversity can be encouraged and implemented in tundra ecological studies. We briefly review previous bryophyte functional classifications and the roles of bryophytes in tundra ecosystems and their susceptibility to environmental change. Based on shoot morphology and colony organization, we then propose twelve easily distinguishable bryophyte functional groups. To illustrate how bryophyte functional groups can help elucidate variation in bryophyte effects and responses, we compiled existing data on water holding capacity, a key bryophyte trait. Although plant functional groups can mask potentially high interspecific and intraspecific variability, we found better separation of bryophyte functional group means compared with previous grouping systems regarding water holding capacity. This suggests that our bryophyte functional groups truly represent variation in the functional roles of bryophytes in tundra ecosystems. Lastly, we provide recommendations to improve the monitoring of bryophyte community changes in tundra study sites.
AB - The relative contribution of bryophytes to plant diversity, primary productivity, and ecosystem functioning increases towards colder climates. Bryophytes respond to environmental changes at the species level, but because bryophyte species are relatively difficult to identify, they are often lumped into one functional group. Consequently, bryophyte function remains poorly resolved. Here, we explore how higher resolution of bryophyte functional diversity can be encouraged and implemented in tundra ecological studies. We briefly review previous bryophyte functional classifications and the roles of bryophytes in tundra ecosystems and their susceptibility to environmental change. Based on shoot morphology and colony organization, we then propose twelve easily distinguishable bryophyte functional groups. To illustrate how bryophyte functional groups can help elucidate variation in bryophyte effects and responses, we compiled existing data on water holding capacity, a key bryophyte trait. Although plant functional groups can mask potentially high interspecific and intraspecific variability, we found better separation of bryophyte functional group means compared with previous grouping systems regarding water holding capacity. This suggests that our bryophyte functional groups truly represent variation in the functional roles of bryophytes in tundra ecosystems. Lastly, we provide recommendations to improve the monitoring of bryophyte community changes in tundra study sites.
U2 - 10.1139/as-2020-0057
DO - 10.1139/as-2020-0057
M3 - Review
VL - 8
JO - Arctic Science
JF - Arctic Science
SN - 2368-7460
IS - 3
ER -
ID: 298479174